|
Further description:-
Contaminants
Further Description |
|
Contaminated land contains a huge variety of contaminants depending on the source, the age of the contamination and the type of activity, which has given rise to the contamination. The contaminated sites can be subdivided into a number of different types of sites, and knowing the type of site, the contaminants to be found at the site can be predicted to a certain degree. In Table 1, a number of site categories have been listed indicating the contaminants normally found at such sites.
|
Type of contaminated site |
Selected potential contaminants to
be found at the site |
|
Oil, petroleum (refineries, etc.)
and gasoline |
Monoaromatic hydrocarbons (BTEX),
PAH, n-alkanes (C5-C20), MTBE, Pb |
|
Paint industries |
Chlorinated and aromatic solvents,
BTEX, alcohols, esters, glycolethers, ethylbenzene, various heavy metals (Cd,
Pb, Cu, Zn, Fe, Cr), As |
|
Asphalt and tar production |
BTEX, phenols, naphthalene, PAH |
|
Gas works, coke works, coal
gasification |
BTEX, phenols, PAH, Cyanide, Ammonia,
sulphur compounds, As, Cr |
|
Leather manufacturing (tanning
etc.) |
Chlorinated aliphatics, BTEX, Cr,
As, Fe |
|
Wood preservation |
Phenols, chlorophenols (PCP), Cr,
Zn, As, Cu, PCB, PAH, |
|
Cleansing operation sites |
Chlorinated aliphatics (TCE, PCE) |
|
Textile and dye works |
Chlorinated aromatics,
polypropylene, polyethylene, TCA, Cd, Zn, Fe, Mn, Cr |
|
Electroplating, Galvanisation |
Various heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu,
Ni, etc.), cyanide |
|
Soap and detergent manufacturing |
Detergents |
|
Iron and steel works |
Chlorinated aliphatics, various
heavy metals |
|
Plastics manufacturing |
Phthalates, resins, polymers, |
|
Pharmaceuticals |
Antibiotics, estrogens, cholesterols,
clofibric acid, naproxen, ibuprofen |
|
Pulp and paper |
PCB, dioxins, furans, chlorinated
phenols, organosulfur compounds, various heavy metals (Zn, Pb, Cr), Cyanide |
|
Military sites, explosives
manufacturing |
Nitroaromatics, nitroglycerin,
BTEX, aliphatic hydrocarbons |
|
Chemicals manufacturing works |
All contaminants |
|
Landfills, hazardous waste
disposal sites |
All contaminants |
The soil groundwater contaminants, which
have been in focus during the last 30 years since public concern arose on the
threat from these types of contamination, comprise many different organic and
inorganic compounds showing huge variety in terms of mobility, toxicity and
persistence in the soil and groundwater environment. The most frequent
compounds identified are different fractions of oil. These are low molecular
aromatics like the monoaromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, xylenes, toluene and
ethylbenzene – normally, normally abbreviated BTEX), aliphatic hydrocarbons,
and high molecular polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs containing more than
two aromatic rings), of which some are very potent carcinogens. Another group
of compounds, which has attracted much attention, is the chlorinated compounds,
which comprise chlorinated aliphatics, i.e. 1,1,1-trichloroethene, chlorinated
aromatics, such as the chlorobenzenes, and the chlorophenols. Together with
these two types of compounds, the pesticides constitute a group, which has been
in focus for many years and in fact often has been the direct cause for closing
down groundwater extraction wells. This is a very heterogeneous group of
groundwater contaminants, which comprises compounds, which belong to many
different categories. Chemically, these compounds cannot be described as
belonging to one group, and since they are not considered to be a result of
point sources, they are not very often seen as a contaminated land or
brownfield issue. However, it has been shown that these contaminants often contaminate
groundwater reservoirs as a result of filling operation or improper storage.
Also the heavy metals need to be
mentioned in this context, since they from very early on attracted much
attention as soil contaminants. They differ from the organic compounds in the
sense that they are not degraded in the environment.
A number of processes governs the fate and transport of contaminants in the subsurface environment, of which biodegradation, adsorption/desorption, dissolution, volatilisation and dispersion are the most important ones. Also processes such as chemical oxidation, incorporation, diffusion, chemical speciation, precipitation, might for some substances play a role. Once a contaminant enters the environment, it will partition between the different phases (mineral surface, organic matter, pore water, air and bulk organics (NAPLs) if available) according to its physico-chemical properties (hydrophobicity, solubility, and volatility). It will then be transported by the media, if there is a flow. In soil they will be transported mostly downwards by infiltrating water or by the groundwater or upwards by airflow. During the flow they will be attenuated in the soil-water/air medium depending on its hydrophobicity relative to the water or air flow rate, and it will be transformed during the transport through the soil and in the groundwater according to its aerobic and anaerobic degradability or chemical reactivity. Since biodegradation is the most important process to effectively remove organic contaminants from the environment, this process is exploited in a number of in situ and ex situ remediation technologies. In Table 2 is indicated the potential aerobic and anaerobic biodegradability of a number of organic contaminant fractions.
Table 2. Potential biodegradability of organic point
source contaminants under different redox conditions
|
Compound |
Aerobic conditions |
Denitrifying conditions |
Sulfate-reducing conditions |
Iron-reducing conditions |
Methanogenic conditions |
|
BTEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benzene |
++ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
|
Toluene |
++ |
++ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
o-Xylene |
++ |
+/-1) |
- |
- |
+/- |
|
MTBE |
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
PAH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naphthalene |
++ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
Phenanthrene |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
|
Pyrene |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Benz(a)pyrene |
+/- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Phenols |
++ |
++ |
+ |
+ |
++ |
|
Chlorophenols |
++ |
- |
+ |
|
+ |
|
Chlorinated aliphatics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,1,1-TCE |
-/+1) |
- |
+ |
|
+ |
|
1,1,1-TCA |
-/+1) |
|
+ |
|
+ |
|
PCE |
- |
- |
+ |
|
+ |
|
Chlorinated aromatics |
-/+ |
|
|
|
+ |
|
NSO-heterocyclic compounds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pyridine |
++ |
|
|
|
|
|
Quinoline |
++ |
|
|
|
|
|
Carbazole |
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
Dibenzothiophene |
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
Detergents |
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
LAS |
++ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Alcoholethoxylates |
++ |
+/- |
+/- |
|
+/- |
++: Fast degradation; +: Degradation; -: Persistence
1) Required sometimes primary substrate
Based on an integrated knowledge on
these processes, the geochemistry and geology of the soil and the aquifer at
the site, and the properties of the contaminant, the fate and transport and
thus the potential exposure of a given receptor can be predicted. Furthermore,
an understanding of the governing biogeochemical processes in soil and
groundwater is a prerequisite for designing in situ remedial actions.
The toxicity of the most frequently
found soil and groundwater contaminants varies considerably depending on their
physio-chemical properties. Some of the compounds show high acute toxicity,
i.e. chromium and some alkyl phenols, while others are more known for the
carcinogenic properties, such as some of the PAHs, benzene, and
1,1,1-trichloroethene.
However, when considering the
environmental or public health risk of the contaminants, it is equally
important to take into account the potential of the contaminant to be
transported to and reach whatever receptor is considered, being individuals,
buildings, groundwater reservoirs, animals or other environmental indicators.
As mentioned above, some of the contaminants are much more mobile in the
environment than others. Thus, the (bio)availability is the key parameter for
estimating the risk. The most critical contaminants are those, which are
volatile or water soluble and therefore rapidly transported by water or air
with minimum of attenuation, which are less degradable in the medium and which
at the same time have high toxicological effect. Such compounds are benzene and
1,1,1-trichlorothene, while some of the toxic heavy metals or the PAHs are not
very mobile in the environment.
The different contaminants are given
priority in the public regulation and the cleanup efforts according to their
potential human health effects, although also ecotoxicity in many countries
plays an important role. There are 3 basic approaches to risk reduction, which
often are applied at the same time:
o
Removing the contamination
o
Pathway interruption
o
Protection of receptors.
Removing the source might include
either transferring the contamination from the medium to another to minimize exposure
of targets, removing the medium containing the contamination, or destruction of
the contamination either within the medium or after extraction from the medium.
In some remediation technologies, a combination of removing the contamination
and disruption of the pathway is applied (reactive barrier technology).
Traditionally, remediation technologies have been divided up in technologies,
which rely on excavation/mechanical handling of the medium before treatment,
which are termed on site - or ex situ if the contaminated medium
is transported away form the contaminated site – technologies, and in situ
technologies which degrade, extract, or in other way treat the contamination
where it is placed without disturbing the medium which contains it (Bardos et
al. 2000).
In this context, remediation is supposed
to target both the original source, which is the area with some separate phase
liquid remaining, and the plume area defined as the area contaminated by
contaminants dissolved in the flow medium. The selection of remediation
technology is dependent on the physio-chemical and geological characteristics
of the site and the type of contamination. In most cases different types of
contaminants are found in the same site, and the technology must then be
selected according to its efficiency towards the most difficult contaminants,
and in many cases a number of different technologies must be applied to reach
cleanup criteria for all contaminants. In Table 3 are shown the feasibility of
different techniques towards selected groups of contaminants.
Table 3. feasibility1) of selected remediation technologies towards different groups of contaminants in soil and groundwater
|
Compounds/-technology |
Natural attenuation |
In situ
bioremedia-tion/bio-venting |
SVE/air sparging |
Thermal desorption |
Reactive barrier |
Solvent/-surfactant flushing |
Soil washing |
Contain-ment/-solidification |
On site/ ex situ bioremedia-tion |
On site/-ex situ
incinera-tion |
On site/-ex situ
extraction |
|
BTEX |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+/- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
PAH |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+/- |
+ |
+ |
|
Phenols |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Chlorinated aliphatics |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+/- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Chlorophenols |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
PCB |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+/- |
+ |
+ |
|
Chlorinated aromatics |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+/- |
+/- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
N-aromatics |
+/- |
+/- |
- |
+/- |
+/- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+/- |
+/- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy metals |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
1) Whether the technology is likely to be beneficial for the group of
compounds in question
Bardos,
P, Morgan, P, Swannell, PJ (2000) Application of in situ remediation
technologies – 1. Contextual framework. Land Contamination &
Reclamation. 8(4), 301-322.
Calow,
P (ed.) (1998) Handbook of Environmental Risk Assessment and management.
Blackwell Science, Ldn..
Nathanail,
P, Bardos, P (2004) Reclamation of Contaminated Land. John Wiley and Sons.
Page,
W (1997) Contaminated sites and environmental cleanup. AP.
Schwarzenbach,
RP, Geschwend, PM, Imboden, DM (1992) Environmental Organic Chemistry. Wiley,
NY.
 
|