Further description:-  Sources 

Glossary Entry
a substance which is located in, on or under the land and has the potential to cause harm to human health, 
water resources or the wider environment. The contamination derives from point or diffuse sources.

1 General approach

Risk assessment techniques are based on a causal model in which a contaminant is transported from a source through a known pathway to a receptor (people, water resources, plants, animals, etc).

SOURCE č PATHWAY č RECEPTOR/TARGET

The first step of the risk assessment is the problem identification, to be seen as the source characterisation. The objectives of the problem identification is to answer to the questions:

  • what do we think the problem is?

  • What information should be collected and assessed to confirm our understanding of the problem?

 

2 Types of sources

Damage of soil functions and the potential contamination of water resources can be generated by diffuse and/or localised sources.

The main diffuse sources of soil contamination are atmospheric deposition of acidifying and eutrophying compounds or potentially harmful chemicals, deposition of contaminants from flowing water or eroded soil itself, and the direct application of substances such as pesticides, sewage sludge, fertilisers and manure.

Soil contamination from localised sources is often related to industrial plants non longer in operation, past industrial accidents and improper municipal and industrial waste disposals.

Pollution can also be related to accidents or chronic emissions of pollutants in the environmental media.

Another distinction can be done between primary (i.e. tanks) and secondary sources of contamination (i.e. soils contaminated by sludge generating groundwater contamination by leakage).

3 Tools for identifying risk sources

3.1 Inventories

To assess the extend of the contamination at national or European levels, inventories of localised contaminated sites are conducted on a local or regional levels. Most of the European States have now an estimation of the number of point sources of contamination (see chapter 5). Some are regularly updated.

3.2 Diagnosis

To qualify and quantify the risks due to contamination sources, there is a need to establish whether contamination is present, at what concentrations and in what media. A phased approach is generally seen as providing the required data in the most cost-effective and efficient manner.

3.3 Use of a Site Conceptual Model

The step-by-step approach is in general based on a site conceptual model presenting the sources, pathways and receptors to be taken into consideration for the site risk assessment. For a better understanding of the site problem, separation between primary and secondary sources can be done.

Click here for more on site conceptual models

 

4 Site and sources characterisation

4.1 Objectives

The aim of the site investigation is to provide appropriate and reliable data against which to assess risks to chosen receptors, which may include: i) humans, ii) water resources, iii) ecosystems (fauna and flora), iv) buildings and structure. Therefore, the step-by-step site investigation should be conducted to meet the risk assessment objectives.

Depending on the situation encountered, site can be considered as an unique source or be composed by several sources (tanks, landfill, contaminated soils).

In particular, for the source characterisation, data on physical and chemical characteristics of contaminants, including their spatial distribution and expected transport and fate are required.

Click here for more on site investigation

 

4.2 Tools

Methodologies for data collection include: i) desk-based studies, ii) general guidance on site investigation methodology, iii) sampling techniques (intrusive or non-intrusive), iv) non-intrusive investigation techniques (e.g. geophysics), v) analysis (both on site and laboratory), vi) data presentation.

Click here for more on site investigation

 

4.3 Limitations of the risk sources characterisation

As for all steps of site investigation related to risk assessment objectives, limitations will be linked to:

  • the level of effort applied to the different levels,
  • the logistical and local constraints to this investigation,
  • the spatial and temporal boundaries,
  • the design, methods and data quality required.

The objective is to provide sufficient information on sources, pathways, receptors and other site-specific characteristic to permit risk assessments with a reasonable level of uncertainties to enable the selection of appropriate remedial and management actions.

 

5 Situation at the European level

 

5.1 Number of sites

The European Environment Agency has done an estimation of the number of contaminated sites. The European Countries currently conduct different types of inventories. Estimations are related to potentially contaminated sites or known contaminated sites in relation with industrial, waste treatment or military activities. Table 29 shows the situation in 2000.

Table 1. Estimation of potentially and known contaminated sites in European countries as of August 1999 (EEA, 2000)


Important differences are identified due to:

  • the types of activities inventoried (all three categories, or only one),

  • former or operating activities,

  • the size of the industrial activities taken into consideration (those covered by the IPPC – considered as highly risky sites, smaller sites, etc.).

 

5.2 Types of activities

Effects of industrial activities that pose a risk to soils and groundwater resources and the spectrum of the various polluting activities vary between countries. But in the countries analysed, there is a broad common picture of the main soil-polluting activities. A direct quantification of hazardous substances input into soil is almost impossible though.

Figure 1. Soil-polluting activities from localised sources as a percentage of total

Source: EIONET priority data flow; September 2003. For DK, GE, LI, NL, ES: Pilot EIONET data flow; January 2002; for RO: data request new EEA member countries, February 2002.
NB: 2003 data not yet published, subject to validation

Notes: (a) Switzerland: ‘Municipal waste disposal’ also include ‘Industrial waste disposal’; ‘former military sites’ also include active military sites and shooting ranges.

(b) Spain: ‘Municipal waste disposal’ also includes ‘Industrial waste disposal’

(c) Romania: ‘others’ also include accidents

(d) Netherlands: ‘others’ also include accidents

(e) Liechtenstein: ‘others’ only refer to accidents; minor accidents are not included.

(f) Lithuania: petrol stations included in ‘oil extraction’; pesticide storage installations included in ‘other hazardous substances spill sites’

(g) Germany: ‘Industrial activities’ also include accidents and ‘other’; ’Municipal waste disposal’ also include ‘Industrial waste disposal’

    1. Finland: service station, big fuel and heating oil storage installations included in ‘oil extraction’
    1. Denmark: ‘Municipal waste disposal' also includes ‘Industrial waste disposal’
    2. Bulgaria: ‘others’ are storage installations of forbidden (obsolete) pesticides
    3. Finland: service station, big fuel and heating oil storage installations included in ‘oil extraction’

(k) Belgium-Flanders: ‘oil extraction and storage sites’ also include ‘oil spills sites’ several activities can occur together on 1 site (127%)

For DK, GE, LI, NL, ES and RO the category ‘Industrial activities’ was used instead of the here used ‘industrial and commercial sites’.

The main activities identified as main sources of local pollution are:

  • Waste deposits,

  • Industrial activities in particular, Petrol & Gas industries, chemistry, ferrous and non ferrous industries,

  • Commercial activities such as cleaning sites.

 

6 Author

DARMENDRAIL Dominique, BRGM - Environment & Process Division, www.brgm.fr

 

7 Acknowledgement

Extracted from:

European Environment Agency
Management of contaminated sites in Western Europe – June 2000
http://reports.eea.eu.int/Topic_report_No_131999/en/topic_13_1999.pdf

Key Documents

European Environment Agency
Management of contaminated sites in Western Europe – June 2000

http://reports.eea.eu.int/Topic_report_No_131999/en/topic_13_1999.pdf


Useful Web Links

Ad Hoc International Working Group on Contaminated Land
http://www.adhocgroup.ch/

CARACAS: Concerted Action on Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in the European Union - (EC 4Th Framework Research Program)
http://www.caracas.at

CLARINET: Contaminated Land Reclamation Network for Environmental Technologies in Europe - (EC 5Th Framework Research Program)
http://www.clarinet.at

 

 List of Key Technical Terms

Term

Description

Hazard

The potential of a risk source to cause an adverse effect(s)/event(s)

Hazard Identification

The identification of a risk source (s) capable of causing adverse effect(s)/event(s) to humans or the environment, together with a qualitative description of the nature of these effect(s)/event(s)

Risk Source

Agent, Medium, commercial/industrial process, procedure or site with the potential to cause an adverse effect/event(s)

 

Authors
Dominique Darmendrail
BRGM, France

Who does what?